Knight and Butler agree with that ancient peoples possessed scientific advantage. While this is usally not very news to many who've examine exceedingly barely of the historical preceding of our remote preceding, the authors source furthermore recognise-how. Stonehenge and selected other preceding buildings, in step with the authors, are sacred observational ritual locations. After spending time in many Native American ruins throughout the US and seeing their advantage of the planets and stars, I come across the proven reality that those had been linked to the celebs to be a now not dear clarification.
I examine this booklet just after i examine Dan Brown's The Lost Symbol, now not knowing the shut connection of a giant sequence of of the portions. I expect Brown knew of Knight and Butler's studies, since they mention that he used a giant sequence of of their work in his preceding novel, The Da Vinci Code. Whether he did or now not does now not detract from either work, nor is the factor of interest an analogous. What is great, despite the fact that, are the similarities of both books seeing the associated fee of Washington DC and a giant sequence of of the properties inside that the town.
What is basically as brain-blowing is the associated fee of the preceding that permeates both books. Is there advantage we've got without main issue forgotten it for sure is most often coming to faded due to these relatively 1000s of books, both in fiction and nonfiction? Do we want to pass to come back again to the preceding as we circulate forward? Signs look to be pointing in that direction.
Knight and Butler mention the associated fee of the planet Venus and the famous person Sirius to early civilizations. Are there revelations we're to encounter that link our preceding to two of the much elegant lighting throughout the sky? I will near to effortlessly now not be amazed if furthermore studies reveals that to be true. The Freemasons, the mysterious collage it for sure is receiving so lots press these days, look to have a connection to Venus and its relation to the Sun in their rituals. The authors claim this presentations an really worth of the feminine and astrology in Freemasonry. Future studies would additionally be certain that.
There are other observations throughout the booklet:
1) The authors mention the associated fee of astrology, now not only astronomy in their findings. They factor out that Newton and other scientists studied astrology.
2) The ancient British had been more perplexing in astronomy than the Egyptians.
3) Sumerians, throughout the neighborhood it for sure is now Iraq, arrived in approximately 3250 BC and no man or females appears to recognise whereby those technologically and intellectually state of the art peoples purchased the next from.
four) Rosslyn, the chapel so usally linked to the Freemasonry preceding and likewise elegant in Brown's The Da Vinci Code, is an observatory barely like Stonehenge and the pyramids, now not a church.
five) Washington DC is but some other observatory website barely like Stonehenge, the pyramids, and Rosslyn.
This booklet has lots scientific documents a couple of Megalithic Yard it for sure is likewise traced to come back again to the pyramids and beyond. While one can get lost throughout the technical descriptions, they do source validation to these approaches that would near to effortlessly in differently be just sexy. Perhaps the authors pass too a methods when they factor out that each one noticeable web pages in Washington, DC are related by an cyber information superhighway measured throughout the Megalithic Yard, bringing the Freemasonry mystique to the america. The authors factor out the opportunity "that Washington DC is a continuation of advantage held by a cosmopolitan tradition from the bright preceding. And there retains to be an elite collage of of us who solely to think of this" (208).
They claim that the Sphinx and other Egyptian status buildings "end up beyond doubt that the emergence of civilization... purchased the next about lengthy in the past orthodox historical preceding has ever seen" (209). And they factor out that now's the time to "visible charm again at approaches of the preceding" (211). Are their conclusions accurate? I do now not agree with there's enough steering attainable. But their findings pose questions of a preceding technique more enjoyable than any fiction, and I do agree with that the surest is but to come back.
This just isn't very as to hand analyzing as Brown's novel, but it poses related questions. How victorious, despite the fact that, for readers that those two books arrive on the industry at identical time, providing identical advantage in varying forms. Perhaps we want to pay consciousness.
0 Response to "Beyond the Pyramids - Cracking Archaeology's Greatest Mystery through Christopher Knight and Alan Butler"
Posting Komentar